Because it’s Friday: Paul the Octopus

58 sec read

In 2010, the most accurate World Cup forecaster on the planet was an octopus named Paul. He lived at the Sea Life aquarium in Oberhausen, Germany, and his method was rigorous: before each match, his keepers lowered two boxes of mussels into his tank, one marked with each team’s flag, and whichever box he opened first was his pick. He went eight for eight that summer, calling all seven of Germany’s matches correctly, including their losses, and then picking Spain over the Netherlands in the final.

Eight correct picks in a row is a 1 in 256 shot if you assume he was guessing, and the world reacted about how you’d expect. Eliminated fans sent death threats, with one Argentine newspaper going as far as printing a recipe. After Paul picked Spain over Germany in the semifinal, the Spanish prime minister offered to send a security team to protect him from his own countrymen. Offers to buy him poured in, including 100,000 euros from a Russian bookmaker and a bid from the Madrid Zoo to beat any offer on the table. His aquarium declined them all. Paul retired undefeated and died of natural causes that October at the age of two and a half, which for an octopus is a full life and a remarkable career.

The animal kingdom has been trying to replicate the run ever since, and the long list of oracle parakeets, psychic pigs, and prophetic cats that followed have one thing in common, which is that none of them came close. Next week I’m writing about whether predictive models can do better with this World Cup. The bar was set sixteen years ago by an invertebrate, and it is high.

Enjoy the first weekend of group stage games.

Because it’s Friday: The First World Cup Final

The first World Cup final, played in Montevideo on July 30, 1930, couldn’t even agree on a ball. Uruguay and Argentina each insisted on...
mladvocate
38 sec read

Because it’s Friday: Claude Has Feelings About This

Anthropic’s interpretability team just published a paper on why LLMs sometimes act like they have emotions. The answer turned out to be: because they...
mladvocate
54 sec read

Because it’s Friday: The Science of Optimal Laziness

In 2022, two researchers published a paper modeling the mathematically ideal amount of effort to exert when you don’t want to do something. It...
mladvocate
35 sec read

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

SiteLock
ML Advocate Assistant
Answers from the blog
Hi! 👋 Ask me anything about machine learning and AI! I'll answer using ML Advocate blog posts.